Taking an environmentally sensitive approach to pest management


SUBSCRIBE

Soybean Nematodes in East Central Missouri

During 2024 and 2025 and with support from the Missouri Soybean Merchandising Council, we surveyed 27 soybean fields across 11 East Central Missouri counties (Crawford, Franklin, Gasconade, Lincoln, Montgomery, Perry, St. Charles, St. Francois, St. Louis County, Ste. Genevieve, and Warren) to better understand which plant-parasitic nematodes are present and at what population levels.

Nematodes are common, but presence does not always mean damage

Seven types (or taxa) of plant-parasitic nematodes were detected in the region. Spiral and soybean cyst nematode (SCN) were each found in 78% of fields, and root-lesion nematode was found in 74%. Stunt, lance, pin, and dagger nematodes were detected less frequently (Figure 1). Finding a nematode does not necessarily mean it is causing yield loss. Risk depends on the nematode, population density, crop, and field conditions.

Table comparing nematode occurrence in East Central Missouri, soil density, maximum population, and soybean or corn hosts.

Figure 1 Prevalence (% of fields with detection) and population densities of plant-parasitic nematodes detected in 27 soybean fields across 11 counties in East Central Missouri. Median and maximum population densities are based on positive soil samples only and are reported per 100 cm³ of soil. In the host column, icons indicate the nematode's potential to feed on soybean and/or corn. Host status may vary among nematode species within each group.

SCN was the primary concern in East Central Missouri, but the region had a relatively diverse nematode community. Stunt and lance nematodes were detected in 41% and 26% of fields, respectively. Pin nematode was uncommon, but reached relatively high populations where detected, showing why less common nematodes can still be important in individual fields.

SCN reproduction differs among resistance sources

We also tested how well these SCN populations reproduce on common sources of SCN resistance. Among the East Central Missouri SCN populations tested, for every 100 females that developed on a susceptible soybean, a median of 65 females developed on PI 88788 (the most common SCN resistance source found in Missouri soybean). On Peking, the median was much lower with 11 females per 100 on susceptible soybean. The higher reproduction on PI 88788 reinforces the importance of knowing and rotating with non-host crops and soybean with other SCN-resistance sources.

What could this mean for yield?

Using representative East Central Missouri conditions and the SCN Coalition Profit Checker, the estimated potential yield loss was 8.5%, or about 4.3 bu/acre and $55/acre. Actual estimates depend on SCN population density, virulence (ability to reproduce on the soybean), field conditions, expected yield, and soybean price.

Don't rely on symptoms alone

Nematode problems can be easy to miss. A field with SCN can look healthy while yield is being lost. Stunting, yellowing, uneven growth, and poorly performing areas can indicate a significant problem; however, those symptoms are not specific to only nematodes.

Management starts with knowing what is in the field. For SCN, use resistant varieties, rotate resistance sources such as PI 88788 and Peking, and rotate with a nonhost crop such as corn. Nematode-protectant seed treatments may also provide early-season protection. Management options for other nematodes depend on the species and population density, and resistant varieties are not available for many of them.

Don't guess. Sample. Missouri soybean growers can currently submit up to four soil samples for free SCN egg counts through SCN Diagnostics, supported by the Missouri Soybean Merchandising Council. Visit SCN Diagnostics for more information.

   About IPM     Contact Us    Subscribe     Unsubscribe

Copyright © 2026 — Curators of the University of Missouri. All rights reserved. DMCA and other copyright information. An equal opportunity/access/affirmative action/pro-disabled and veteran employer.

Printed from: https://ipm.missouri.edu
E-mail: IPM@missouri.edu

REVISED: September 17, 2026